Skip to content Skip to footer site map

Recovery.gov - Track the Money

Recovery.gov is the U.S. government's official website that provides easy access to data
related to Recovery Act spending and allows for the reporting of potential fraud, waste, and abuse.

Agency Reporting


< Back to Agency Plan
Program Plan
National Science Foundation - Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) Recovery Plan
Updated 05/14/2009
Objectives
Program Purpose

The Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction (MREFC) Program aims to create a modern and effective research infrastructure critical to maintaining U.S. leadership in science and engineering. The $400 million provided to NSF for this program will support three major facilities: the Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (ATST), the Alaska Region Research Vessel (ARRV), and the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI).


Public Benefits

ATST: As a national facility, ATST would enable training of the next generation of solar physicists and instrument builders at the undergraduate and graduate levels. ARRA funding for ATST will support a larger project team (staff retentions and new hires) at the National Solar Observatory and the issuance of large contracts for the construction of the telescope and its building, support facilities, as well as the procurement of components for its complex optical systems and instruments. As the first new large solar telescope constructed in nearly 30 years and because of the new range of scientifically compelling questions that ATST can address, its construction is expected to rejuvenate the solar research community in U.S. universities.

ARRV: The vessel will provide a technologically-advanced, safe, and highly effective oceanographic platform to enable multidisciplinary teams to conduct field research at the ice edge and in seasonal sea ice. The Bering Sea and the Gulf of Alaska sustain more than half of the total annual national fish catch and supports one of the most productive marine ecosystems in the world, as well as rich and varied marine mammal populations. The Alaska region is also seeing significant impacts from climate change. Perennial sea ice has been estimated to be decreasing by about nine percent per decade, potentially leading to a summer ice-free Arctic Ocean by the end of the century or even sooner. The ARRV will provide scientific access to these remote and inhospitable waters surrounding Alaska that are of such great national and international importance. The ARRV will have many advanced capabilities including a modern suite of satellite communications to link the ship to educational facilities ashore giving them virtual access to the Arctic. With 26 dedicated science berths, the ARRV will be able to accommodate over 500 researchers and students annually while spending as many as 300 days at sea.

OOI: Recent science advances have highlighted the role of the ocean in climate change, the impact of carbon cycling on ocean acidification and ocean carbon sequestration, and the degradation of coastal marine ecosystems. These advances and the national attention they have garnered emphasize the multiple stakeholders in OOI. Additionally, the magnitude and mechanisms of air-sea exchange, the fundamental processes that control turbulent ocean mixing on all scales and the biophysical consequences thereof, and the impact of plate tectonics on the sea floor and society underpin these topics. These science drivers are also part of a national ocean research effort, the Ocean Research Priorities Plan, which provides a framework for research investments to advance our understanding of critical ocean processes that tie to societal need. The OOI will also include educational infrastructure that will support “free choice” learning in a variety of both physical and virtual settings with a focus on raising public awareness about ocean science, climate change, and enabling technology, while also supporting online post-secondary career, technical, and educator training programs.


Measures
The measures have been revised to enrich the performance metrics for Recovery targets. In some instances, targets will not be available until additional baseline data has been collected.

MeasureTarget/Actual
2009201020112012
[-] ATST: Keep Negative Cost and Schedule Variance to Less than 10 Percent
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Monthly
Direction : Decreasing
Type : Efficiency
Explanation : ATST: Target with ARRA funding represents a change in cost and schedule baseline, with the schedule having been moved up by 1-2 years. Project not yet mature enough to collect earned value management data.
Unit : variance
[-] ARRV: Keep Negative Cost and Schedule Variance to Less than 10 Percent
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Monthly
Direction : Decreasing
Type : Efficiency
Explanation : ARRV: Target with ARRA funding represents a change in cost and schedule baseline, with the schedule having been moved up 6-9 months. Project not yet mature enough to collect earned value management data.
Unit : variance
[-] OOI: Keep Negative Cost and Schedule Variance to Less than 10 Percent
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Monthly
Direction : Decreasing
Type : Efficiency
Explanation : OOI: Target with ARRA funding represents a change in cost and schedule baseline, with the schedule having been moved up by about one year. Project not yet mature enough to collect earned value management data.
Unit : variance

Schedule and Milestones

See milestones


Milestones
Milestone Completion Date
Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (ATST)
Annual Safety Review – May 1, 2009
Final Design Review – May 18-22, 2009
Construction Funding Awarded – December 31, 2009
Telescope Mount RFP issued – March 1, 2010
Mirror blank RFP issued – April 1, 2010
Annual Safety Review – May 1, 2010
Telescope mount contract placed – September 15, 2010
Mirror blank contract awarded – September 30, 2010
Mirror polish RFP issued – September 30, 2010
09/30/2010
Alaska Region Research Vessel (ARRV)
Shipyard Inspections: June 22 – July 3, 2009
Shipyard ”Best Value” Selection: October 15, 2009
Shipyard Contract Award: NLT December 31, 2009
Complete Design Transfer to Shipyard: March 31, 2010
Begin Construction (Keel Laying): May 1, 2010
Begin Module Assembly: July 1. 2010
Begin Auxilliary System Installations & Noise Treatments: September 1, 2010
09/30/2010
Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI)
Primary infrastructure cable contract award – September 30, 2009
Education and Public Engagement Implementing Organization (IO) award – December 31, 2009
Semi-annual external performance review – April 30, 2010
Medium Voltage Converter (MVC) readiness decision – June 30, 2010
Prototype testing of Extension cables and cable terminations complete – June 30, 2010
Coastal Winched Profiler readiness decision – September 30, 2010

09/30/2010

Projects and Activities

Advanced Technology Solar Telescope (ATST)
Alaska Region Research Vessel (ARRV)
Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI)


Review Process

The three projects selected for ARRA funding are subject to the oversight process described in NSF’s Large Facilities Manual. (See http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf0738 ). During construction, NSF exercises oversight of each project through a variety of mechanisms. In addition to normal day-to-day discussions with awardees, each project reports at least monthly to the cognizant NSF Program Officer on its technical and financial status relative to a baseline schedule utilizing earned-value management techniques. NSF program staff conduct site visits throughout the construction period, and periodic external reviews are held at least annually that utilize panels of outside experts to advise NSF on a wide variety of topics. Review topics may include, but are not limited to, technical performance, adherence to cost and schedule baselines, and awardee management. Each project follows a documented change control procedure, and each award contains terms and conditions that require NSF concurrence for major changes to a project’s intended scope, budget, or schedule. The progress of each project is closely monitored, and cost and schedule information is compiled and reported monthly to NSF senior management. As an additional mitigation measure, NSF will conduct a review of the business systems of each awardee within the duration of the award period to monitor compliance with administrative requirements for grants and agreements (Chapter 2, Part 215 of OMB Circular A-110).


Cost and Performance Plan

NSF monitors the progress of construction of the MREFC facilities through various mechanisms such as site visits and reviews by external panels of experts. Review topics may include, but are not limited to, technical performance, adherence to cost and schedule baselines, and project management. Each project follows a documented change control procedure, and each award contains terms and conditions that require NSF concurrence for major changes to a project’s intended scope, budget, or schedule. The progress of each project is closely monitored, and grantees report to NSF on a monthly basis. NSF will make information from grantees available to the public annually before the end of the first quarter of the subsequent fiscal year. For example, information on progress made during FY 2009 will be made available by December 31, 2009. The information will be made available on NSF’s Recovery website. (www.nsf.gov/recovery)


Energy Efficiency Spending Plans

Not applicable.


Program Plan Award Types
No Data Available