| Measure | Target/Actual |
|---|
| 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 |
|---|
[-]
Number of direct site assessments initiated | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Site Assessments Initiated -- the initiation of a determination of the extent and location of soil and groundwater contaminated by a release from a federally regulated petroleum UST, as required by state site assessment rules and/or guidelines.
Direct - means a state or territory funded the site work (e.g., drilling, lab work, corrective action plan development) with LUST Recovery Act money, regardless of the funding source for the oversight. Typically, states have contractors perform such work, although some states may conduct these activities with their own staff/equipment. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Direct" work should not be counted as "Indirect" work.
| | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of indirect site assessments initiated | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Site Assessments Initiated -- the initiation of a determination of the extent and location of soil and groundwater contaminated by a release from a federally regulated petroleum UST, as required by state site assessment rules and/or guidelines.
Indirect - means a state or territory used LUST Recovery Act money to pay for the oversight of the site work, but the site work itself was not funded with LUST Recovery Act funds. Oversight activities might include enforcement actions to compel the tank owner to perform work or the review of corrective action reports. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Indirect" work should not be counted as "Direct" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of direct site assessments completed | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Site Assessments Completed -- the completion of a determination of the extent and location of soil and groundwater contaminated by a release from a federally regulated petroleum UST, as required by state site assessment rules and/or guidelines. Note: If multiple tiers of site assessment are needed/performed at a given site, a state should only report the assessment once the final tier is completed, and may only count that as one site assessment.
Direct - means a state or territory funded the site work (e.g., drilling, lab work, corrective action plan development) with LUST Recovery Act money, regardless of the funding source for the oversight. Typically, states have contractors perform such work, although some states may conduct these activities with their own staff/equipment. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Direct" work should not be counted as "Indirect" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of indirect site assessments completed | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Site Assessments Completed -- the completion of a determination of the extent and location of soil and groundwater contaminated by a release from a federally regulated petroleum UST, as required by state site assessment rules and/or guidelines. Note: If multiple tiers of site assessment are needed/performed at a given site, a state should only report the assessment once the final tier is completed, and may only count that as one site assessment. Indirect - means a state or territory used LUST Recovery Act money to pay for the oversight of the site work, but the site work itself was not funded with LUST Recovery Act funds. Oversight activities might include enforcement actions to compel the tank owner to perform work or the review of corrective action reports. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Indirect" work should not be counted as "Direct" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of direct cleanups initiated | - | 1600/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Cleanups initiated -- physical activity (e.g., pumping, soil removal, recovery well installation) has begun at the site. For complete definition see http://www.epa.gov/OUST/cat/pm032603.pdf .
Direct - means a state or territory funded the site work (e.g., drilling, lab work, corrective action plan development) with LUST Recovery Act money, regardless of the funding source for the oversight. Typically, states have contractors perform such work, although some states may conduct these activities with their own staff/equipment. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Direct" work should not be counted as "Indirect" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of indirect cleanups initiated | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Cleanups initiated -- physical activity (e.g., pumping, soil removal, recovery well installation) has begun at the site. For complete definition see http://www.epa.gov/OUST/cat/pm032603.pdf .
Indirect - means a state or territory used LUST Recovery Act money to pay for the oversight of the site work, but the site work itself was not funded with LUST Recovery Act funds. Oversight activities might include enforcement actions to compel the tank owner to perform work or the review of corrective action reports. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Indirect" work should not be counted as "Direct" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of direct cleanups completed | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Cleanups completed -- confirmed releases where cleanup has been initiated and where a state or territory has determined that no further actions are currently necessary to protect human health and the environment. For complete definition see http://www.epa.gov/OUST/cat/pm032603.pdf
Direct - means a state or territory funded the site work (e.g., drilling, lab work, corrective action plan development) with LUST Recovery Act money, regardless of the funding source for the oversight. Typically, states have contractors perform such work, although some states may conduct these activities with their own staff/equipment. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Direct" work should not be counted as "Indirect" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|
[-]
Number of indirect cleanups completed | - | 0/0 | - | - |
Measure Information
| Frequency : Quarterly | | Direction : Increasing | | Type : Output | Explanation : Cleanups completed -- confirmed releases where cleanup has been initiated and where a state or territory has determined that no further actions are currently necessary to protect human health and the environment. For complete definition see http://www.epa.gov/OUST/cat/pm032603.pdf
Indirect - means a state or territory used LUST Recovery Act money to pay for the oversight of the site work, but the site work itself was not funded with LUST Recovery Act funds. Oversight activities might include enforcement actions to compel the tank owner to perform work or the review of corrective action reports. Note: To avoid double counting, any activity (e.g., site assessment) counted as "Indirect" work should not be counted as "Direct" work. | | Unit : No Data Available |
|