Skip to content Skip to footer site map

Recovery.gov - Track the Money

Recovery.gov is the U.S. government's official website that provides easy access to data
related to Recovery Act spending and allows for the reporting of potential fraud, waste, and abuse.

Agency Reporting


< Back to Agency Plan
Program Plan
Department of Health and Human Services - Recovery Act - Comparative Effectiveness Research - Office of the Secretary Recovery Plan
Updated 05/15/2009
Objectives
Program Purpose

The overarching goal of this activity is to improve health outcomes by producing evidence to enhance medical decisions made by patients and their medical providers.


Public Benefits

This goal will be achieved by the Secretary by allocating funds appropriated for comparative effectiveness research to help produce and provide information and research on the relative strengths and weaknesses of various medical interventions. The Department of Health and Human Services uses the definition of comparative effectiveness research as set forth by the Federal Coordinating Council for CER:

Comparative effectiveness research is the conduct and synthesis of systematic research comparing different interventions and strategies to prevent, diagnose, treat and monitor health conditions. The purpose of this research is to inform patients, providers, and decision-makers, responding to their expressed needs, about which interventions are most effective for which patients under specific circumstances. To provide this information, comparative effectiveness research must assess a comprehensive array of health-related outcomes for diverse patient populations. Defined interventions compared may include medications, procedures, medical and assistive devices and technologies, behavioral change strategies, and delivery system interventions. This research necessitates the development, expansion, and use of a variety of data sources and methods to assess comparative effectiveness.

Systematic research methods can include randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, observational cohort analyses, and other new and emerging methodologies. Comparative effectiveness research will give clinicians and patients valid information used to make decisions that will improve the performance of the U.S. health care system. This comparative effectiveness research will improve health outcomes and the safety, quality, affordability and accessibility of health care, including behavioral health care and long-term care. This research supports the strategic goal of high quality, affordable health care for Americans. It specifically supports HHS strategic plan goal 1: improve the safety, quality, affordability and accessibility of health care, including behavioral health care and long-term care.


Measures
The measures have been revised to enrich the performance metrics for Recovery targets. In some instances, targets will not be available until additional baseline data has been collected.

MeasureTarget/Actual
2009201020112012
[-] HHS is working to develop cross-cutting outcome measures for comparative effectiveness research activities across the Department. Initial outcome measures will be developed by December 1, 2009.
----

Measure Information
Frequency : Long-term
Direction : No Data Available
Type : Outcome
Explanation : No Data Available
Unit : No Data Available
[-] Number of Council Meetings
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : No Data Available
Unit : meetings
[-] Number of people and organizations who provide written or verbal comments for Council's consideration
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : No Data Available
Unit : individuals/entities

Schedule and Milestones

HHS will develop a schedule with milestones and planned delivery dates for major phases of the program’s activities. As the Recovery Act requires, HHS will submit an operating plan for this program to the House and Senate Appropriation Committees prior to obligating Federal funds and not later than July 30, 2009.


Milestones
No Data Available

Projects and Activities

HHS is currently developing a plan that specifies the kind and scope of activities that HHS will fund to achieve the program’s objectives. HHS is considering various approaches for this program to complement the funding in AHRQ and NIH. Consistent with the Recovery Act, funds will be used to accelerate the development and dissemination of research assessing the comparative effectiveness of health care treatments and strategies through efforts that 1) conduct, support, or synthesize research that compares the clinical outcomes, effectiveness, and appropriateness of items, services and procedures that are used to prevent, diagnose, or treat diseases, disorders and other health conditions. The Secretary will also allocate funds to encourage the development and use of clinical registries, clinical data networks, and other forms of electronic health data that can be used to generate or obtain outcomes data.

In addition, the Recovery Act instructs the Secretary to enter into a contract with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) for no more than $1.5 million. The IOM is to produce and submit a report to Congress and the Secretary no later than June 30, 2009 recommending priorities for the comparative effectiveness research to be conducted or supported with Recovery Act funds for comparative effectiveness research allocated at the Secretary’s discretion. On February 28, 2009, HHS informed the Appropriations Committees of the House and of the Senate of the planned use of $1.5 million to contract with the IOM for this study. The Recovery Act also requires HHS, jointly with the directors of AHRQ and NIH, to provide an operating plan to Congress before obligating any Recovery Act funds for comparative effectiveness research.

Section 804(f) of the Recovery Act addressed the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research and instructed the Secretary to make no more than $4 million available to the Council for staff and administrative support. On April 23, 2009, HHS informed the Appropriations Committees of the House and of the Senate of the planned use of $1.1 million for logistical and research support for the Federal Coordinating Council in FY 2009.


Review Process

All Recovery Act programs will be assessed for risk and to ensure that appropriate internal controls are in place throughout the entire funding cycle. An internal control is an accounting procedure or system designed to promote efficiency, assure the implementation of policy, and safeguard assets. These assessments will be done consistent with the statutory requirements of the Federal Manager’s Financial Integrity Act and the Improper Payments Information Act, as well as OMB’s circular A-123 “Management’s Responsibility for Internal Control”.

HHS is developing a process for periodic review of the program’s progress to identify areas of high risk, high and low performance, and any plans for longer term impact evaluation.


Cost and Performance Plan

The Office of the Secretary (OS) will be open and transparent in all of its grants competitions that involve spending of Recovery Act funding consistent with statutory and OMB guidance.

HHS will ensure that recipient reporting required by Section 1512 of the Recovery Act and OMB guidance is made available to the public on Recovery.gov by October 10, 2009. HHS will inform recipients of their reporting obligation through standard terms and conditions, grant announcements, contract solicitations, and other program guidance. HHS will provide technical assistance to grantees and contractors and fully utilize Project officers to ensure compliance with reporting requirements. HHS and OS are still finalizing the process surrounding recipient-level reporting to the public. Once the process is finalized the information will be shared with recipients.


Energy Efficiency Spending Plans

The OS does not anticipate any construction or renovation funded under this activity. However, HHS will ensure that it complies with energy efficiency and green building requirements, if applicable.


Program Plan Award Types
No Data Available