Skip to content Skip to footer site map

Recovery.gov - Track the Money

Recovery.gov is the U.S. government's official website that provides easy access to data
related to Recovery Act spending and allows for the reporting of potential fraud, waste, and abuse.

Agency Reporting


< Back to Agency Plan
Program Plan
Department of Health and Human Services - CDC: Infectious Diseases Recovery Plan
Updated 05/15/2009
Objectives
Program Purpose

To improve and support state health departments’ capacity for rapid scale of HAI prevention, dissemination of HHS evidence-based practices within hospitals, targeted monitoring and investigation of the changing epidemiology of HAIs per new prevention collaboratives, and improve State Survey Agency (SA) inspection capability of Ambulatory Surgery Centers nationwide, enabling SAs to identify and correct infection control deficiencies in ambulatory surgical centers.


Public Benefits

Healthcare-associated infections occur in all settings of care. It has been estimated that in 2002, 1.7 million infections and 99,000 associated deaths occurred in hospitals alone. The financial burden attributable to these infections is staggering with an estimated $33 billion in added healthcare costs (2009; 1-2 ). Recent research efforts supported by the CDC and the Agency for Healthcare Research Quality (AHRQ) have shown that implementation of CDC HAI prevention recommendations can reduce some healthcare-associated infections by as much as 70%. Broad implementation of HAI prevention guidelines can result in dramatic reductions in HAIs, which will not only save lives and reduce suffering, but will result in healthcare cost savings, especially in the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Investing in state health departments to promote HAI prevention is critical. States currently have limited activities and no funding from CDC to conduct HAI surveillance and prevention activities. Recovery Act funding will fill an essential gap for state health departments and will build capacity for HAI prevention. This funding will allow states to better promote and coordinate HAI prevention activities in all hospitals in their states. States that currently have this leadership and coordination role (e.g. New York) have shown major decreases in HAIs. This funding will enable states to build a sustainable program to decrease HAIs which will lead to a reduction in healthcare costs, especially for the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Recovery Act funding is restricted to state health department efforts to track and prevent HAIs.

ASCs in the United States have been the fastest growing provider type participating in Medicare, increasing in number by more than 38% between 2002 and 2007. A 2008 Hepatitis C outbreak in Nevada was traced to poor infection control practices at various ASCs (potentially affecting more than 50,000 people). Follow-up surveys throughout Nevada found infection control deficiencies at more than 40% of the ASCs.

1. Scott, R. Douglas. The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention. March 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/Scott_CostPaper.pdf

2. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL, Horan T, Gaynes R, Pollock D, Cardo D. Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep 2007;122:160-166.


Measures
The measures have been revised to enrich the performance metrics for Recovery targets. In some instances, targets will not be available until additional baseline data has been collected.

MeasureTarget/Actual
2009201020112012
[-] % of states with 25% or more of hospitals completing the Multidrug-resistant Organism (MDRO) practice module.
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : NHSN's web application has internal data validity and consistency checks. Data are entered in participating hospitals by trained infection prevention staff using standardized definitions and surveillance methods. Data are reviewed by CDC staff for consistency. ARRA funds will provide States resources to conduct validation studies of data submitted to NHSN; see (http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/index.html)
Unit : %
[-] Ensure that at least 200 survey staff are trained on the use of the new survey tool and protocols, and participation is verified.
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : CMS
Expand the State Survey Agency's capability for conducting ASC surveys: Train at least 200 Federal & State surveyors on HAIs survey tool.
Unit : #
[-] (a) Increase by 100% the number of ASCs surveyed onsite compared to the same time period in the previous year in participating States.
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : CMS
Improve Infection Control Deficiency Identification & Corrective Action: Improve the extent to which ASC infection control deficiencies are identified (through use of a new survey process) and are corrected through Plans of Correction.
Unit : %
[-] (b) Ensure that at least one-third of all non-accredited ASCs have an onsite survey.
-0/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Annual
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : CMS
Improve Infection Control Deficiency Identification & Corrective Action: Improve the extent to which ASC infection control deficiencies are identified (through use of a new survey process) and are corrected through Plans of Correction.
Unit : %
[-] (c) For ASCs surveyed under the new survey process, increase by 50% the percentage of ASCs in which infection control deficiencies are identified.
-0/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Annual
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : Improve Infection Control Deficiency Identification & Corrective Action: Improve the extent to which ASC infection control deficiencies are identified (through use of a new survey process) and are corrected through Plans of Correction.
Unit : %
[-] (d) Ensure that at least 95% of identified Condition-level (serious) deficiencies are remedied within 14 -180 days pursuant to a Plan of Correction.
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : Improve Infection Control Deficiency Identification & Corrective Action: Improve the extent to which ASC infection control deficiencies are identified (through use of a new survey process) and are corrected through Plans of Correction.

Note: There will be a time lag in reporting as corrections are made
Unit : %
[-] % of states for whom 50% or more of participating hospitals are in the 25th percentile in the 2008 NHSN for incidence of: a. Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) b. Clostridium difficile Infections (CDI) c. Catheter-associated Urinary Tract-Infections (CAUTI) d. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) e. Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : ELC measure

NHSN's web application has internal data validity and consistency checks. Data are entered in participating hospitals by trained infection prevention staff using standardized definitions and surveillance methods. Data are reviewed by CDC staff for consistency. ARRA funds will provide States resources to conduct validation studies of data submitted to NHSN; see (http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/index.html)

Unit : %
[-] # of states with one or more collaboratives possessing all 4 key attributes of a strong prevention collaborative [per checklist]
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : ELC measure, Activity C [selected states]:
Number of new HAI collaboratives established


Unit : #
[-] % of all hospitals participating in NHSN [can be broken down by state]
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : ELC Measure, Activity B [selected states]
Number of new healthcare facilities participating in NHSN
Unit : %
[-] % of states in which 80% or more of hospitals are participating in NHSN
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : Activity B [selected states]: Number of new healthcare facilities participating in NHSN
Unit : %
[-] % of states submitting plans
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : Activity A [all funded states]: Number of states with HHS approved HAI prevention plans
Unit : %
[-] % of states with approved plans
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : Activity A [all funded states]: Number of states with HHS approved HAI prevention plans
Unit : %
[-] % of states with a prevention coordinator in place
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Output
Explanation : Activity A [all funded states]: Number of states with HHS approved HAI prevention plans
Unit : %
[-] % of research questions addressed in reports of funded projects
0/00/0--

Measure Information
Frequency : Quarterly
Direction : Increasing
Type : Outcome
Explanation : EIP
EIP projects provide new knowledge
Unit : %

Schedule and Milestones

CDC Milestones = Milestones 1-10

CMS Milestones = Milestones 11-16


Milestones
Milestone Completion Date
CDC Guidance issued for State HAI plans 05/29/2009
Supplemental Awards for ELC 07/31/2009
Draft HAI plans submitted to CDC for review 08/14/2009

Projects and Activities

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CDC will award funding to eligible state health departments to support efforts to prevent HAIs as part of the HHS Action Plan to Prevent HAIs. Existing Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) and the Emerging Infections Programs (EIP) competitive cooperative agreement programs will be utilized to make competitive supplemental awards to eligible state health departments to carry out HAI activities as follows:

Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC)
• Coordinating and reporting of state HAI prevention efforts
• Reporting progress toward reductions on two or more of the targets in the HHS Action Plan To Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections
• Developing sustainable state HAI reporting using the NHSN and to evaluate NHSN data
• Increasing awareness among healthcare providers
• Estimating the burden of HAI
• Monitoring the impact of prevention programs and reporting using NHSN metrics for progress toward HHS HAI Prevention Targets
• Establishing prevention collaborations with healthcare facilities, healthcare professionals, state Hospital associations, and state-based Medicare Quality Improvement Organizations

Emerging Infections Programs (EIP)
• Monitoring and investigating the changing epidemiology of HAIs in populations as a result of prevention collaboratives
• Quickly expanding the EIP infrastructure to address a broader array of HAI epidemiology
• Providing additional training for EIP state staff on HAI epidemiology and surveillance
• Developing and implementing enhanced surveillance tools and methods, and add staff for targeted two year projects

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
This initiative will significantly expand the awareness of proper infection control technique among ASCs and SAs, increase the extent to which infection control deficiencies are both identified and remedied, and prevent future serious infections in ASCs by:

(a) Improving SA inspection capability and frequency for onsite surveys of ASCs nationwide,
(b) Using a new infection control survey tool developed by the CDC and CMS,
(c) Improving the survey process through the use of a CMS tracer methodology, and
(d) Using multi-person teams for ASCs over a certain size or complexity.

A CMS pilot program tested the above survey process improvements in three States in 2008 and demonstrated superior results in the identification and remedy of serious infection control deficiencies. The particular focus on ASCs for this funding was chosen because the available tool was developed and tested for ASCs, because ASCs have not been surveyed with the frequency and attentiveness to infection control that is needed (about once every ten years on average nationally), and because of the likely continuing infection control deficiencies in this setting. The Recovery Act funds will enable the application of the above four-component new survey process nationwide.


Review Process

CDC
CDC has established a centralized management/oversight function, the Recovery Act Coordination (RAC), at the agency level to oversee and coordinate all Recovery Act -funded activities. Quarterly reviews of Recovery Act programs will be conducted by ORAC in collaboration with CDC’s FMO and PGO, as well as HAI program managers. The roles and responsibilities for the RAC oversight function as well as the additional duties of PGO, FMO and the responsible program office are described in CDC’s Recovery Act Implementation Plan.

CDC will perform the following:

• Coordinate with the Office of Inspector General (OIG) to ensure that Recipient Capability Assessments are conducted on funded organizations that may have had performance issues in the past, or are new recipients of CDC-awarded funds;

• Ensure that ongoing technical assistance is provided to contractors and grantees that may need help in meeting the additional Recovery Act administrative and program requirements;

• Conduct additional, more vigorous post-award management and monitoring of Recovery Act activities, to include site visits of Recovery Act grantees if necessary. As resources permit, CDC-sponsored meetings for award recipients will be convened;

• Monitor the receipt of Recovery Act financial and performance reports, and will review those reports for purposes of monitoring compliance with Recovery Act’s special financial requirements; and

• Ensure the unique identification of Recovery Act funds in contractual and grant agreements, to include the use of a unique Recovery Act CFDA number for HAI grants.

• Ensure timely enforcement and other actions for any non-performing Recovery Act contractor or grantee misuse of Recovery Act funds, such as the disallowance of costs, the recovery of funds, the referral of suspected fraud to the OIG, the implementation of administrative corrective actions by the contractor or grantee, or the termination of funding

Program Specific Risk Mitigation Strategies
For EIP and ELC, funds will be specifically awarded for HAI activities only. Eligible applicants will outline a plan for reporting progress toward HHS Action Plan Prevention Targets per specified metrics compatible with NHSN. CDC will collaborate with AHRQ and work with grantees to eliminate duplication of effort, and the EIP and ELC supplemental funding opportunity announcements (FOAs) will require details on how CDC-funded work will link into existing efforts funded by AHRQ.

HAI state applicants will identify state plans for sustaining Recovery Act impact beyond the federal funding provided and demonstrate a continued plan for progress toward meeting HHS Action Plan prevention targets as evidenced through reporting metrics outlined in the Plan.

There will be frequent communication between grant recipients and program staff, including regular conference calls addressing allowable and unallowable expenditures. Appropriate penalties for misappropriation or misuse of funds will be enforced. Tables 2A and 2B include (OMB MAX) a full presentation of the Agency specific Recovery Act Risks and Mitigations for Healthcare-Associated Infections.

Development and submission of HAI grantee plans and quarterly updates on progress towards specific economic and performance measures and targets will help minimize the risk of such abuse, serve as an evaluation of progress, and allow for early and timely risk mitigation.

The HAI proposal was shared with the Office of Inspector General (OIG), and CDC successfully responded to all questions.

CMS
CMS will: 1) obtain detailed information on the ASC infection control deficiencies; 2) analyze associated information to discern patterns and correlates; 3) and evaluate the extent to which States conduct the onsite surveys. Risk mitigation will focus primarily on issues related to addressing State-wide personnel restrictions (per State budget deficits) and obtaining the necessary data on survey re


Cost and Performance Plan

CDC and CMS will: be transparent in all of its Recovery Act contracting and grant competitions and regulations; ensure recipient reporting per Section 1512 is made available to the public on Recovery.gov by October 10, 2009; inform recipients of reporting obligations via standard terms and conditions, grant announcements, contract solicitations, and other program guidance; provide technical assistance to grantees and contractors and fully utilize Project Officers to ensure compliance with reporting requirements, including site visits and frequent communications for costs and performance.

CDC
Healthcare facility data for National Healthcare Safety Network are confidential at the federal level, but some state public health department websites may provide access to specific facility data for facilities in their state. HAI performance measures track the number of states with a "threshold" percentage of healthcare facilities meeting the designated benchmark.

The program and project officers will use data from the quarterly reports and performance data from the grantee progress reports. CDC will appropriately aggregate and disaggregate necessary recipient performance and financial data for public access on www.cdc.gov. It will also be reported in an existing system to CDC's FMO and PGO.

CMS
CMS will publish (www.cms.hhs.gov): the public communications with States (Survey and Certification memoranda) as well as the survey Guidance and protocol documents; results from the quarterly reporting; and completed research per survey results. All grant funds will be designated to State levels per the number of ASCs in that specific State

CDC and CMS will leverage existing internal controls. Senior officials from CDC and CMS will meet regularly with senior Department officials to ensure that projects are meeting their program goals, assessing and mitigating risks, ensuring transparency, and incorporating corrective actions.” The personnel performance appraisal system will also incorporate Recovery Act program stewardship responsibilities for program and business function managers. A point of contact has been established for Recovery.gov to receive and answer public inquiries

CDC
Per CDC’s internal Program Implementation Plan, Programs will be held accountable through both the programmatic review processes and annual performance evaluations. Internal program processes will include quarterly meetings between Division Directors, senior program managers and project officers to address progress to date and discussion of grantee performance. These data will be reviewed by National and Coordinating Center leadership and RAC for discussion with HAI program leadership. Corrective actions will be identified per recipient performance or financial issues, and progress on program improvement will be tracked quarterly.

CMS
CMS will establish additional procedures and practices, as necessary, to ensure proper transparency and accountability by tracking mandatory training in the new survey process for relevant State and federal surveyors and completion of the expected ASC. CMS will incorporate the ASC-HAI performance expectations for States into CMS’ State Performance Standards System (SPSS).

CMS will: communicate to the SAs the intent, purpose, and process for the State grants consistent with Recovery Act funding and requirements; with State officials (such as State Governors) and leadership of state Departments where the State Survey Agencies are organizationally located to address any State gubernatorial or Department-level actions relevant to fulfilling the goals of this initiative. SAs progress will be monitored and the agencies will be held accountable for outcomes via the existing SPSS. CMS will determine if States have applied the Recovery Act dollars consistent with this program’s purpose. Pilot study results and progress reports will be posted on CMS’ Web site


Energy Efficiency Spending Plans

Not Applicable


Program Plan Award Types
No Data Available